-On [20000407 17:10], Lars Clausen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> It's very simple in fact.
>>
>> gtk_init() is within a #if/#ifdef/#endif pair and thus if someone
>> doesn't meet the conditionals requirement gdk_rgb_init() will be called,
>> but there's no preceeding gtk_init() to base it all upon.
>
>That's true, but that happens only when you have neither Gnome or popt. I
>though you said you compiled with Gnome?
Nope, I said I didn't use Gnome. =)
That said, it's still strange that 0.84 supports just GTk+ and that any
version after that would all of a sudden require the bloatware all those
other packages impose on it. It was functional without Gnome, popt and
all that, it should remain that way, since it is still possible!
Just my take on it. =)
>> But I still get the gdk_imlib messages, so something is still fubared in
>> that aspect. I am working on that.
>
>I'll see if I can get gdk_pixbuf everywhere, then you can just use that:)
Then we effectively move all dependencies from imlib to gdk-pixbuf.
Just be sure you do this because gdk-pixbuf is technically superior over
imlib and not because some people on the Gnome list are very fed up with
Rasterman.
Anyways, going back to cleaning up the code. =)
--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> VIA NET.WORKS The Netherlands
BSD: Technical excellence at its best http://www.bart.nl
The Idea does not replace the work...
