Thanks, David, I appreciate it. Despite what many critics say about wikipedia, when it comes to Internet-related subjects like podcasting, there are few, if any, resources that do a better job defining the concept than wikipedia. It's often because the people involved in developing the technologies then contribute to wikipedia as well. -ac

ps - Wikipedia creator Jimmy Wales spoke today at the Berkman conference. In case you missed the live webcast, I've posted a podcast on my mobcasting blog. http://mobcasting.blogspot.com



David P. Dillard wrote:
This message is cheering and amusing to me at the same time.  There has
been, if you will pardon a divergent use of a phrase, a digital divide
about the Wikipedia between academic purists on the one hand who consider
the Wikipedia very suspect because since anyone can change its contents,
it must have many and huge inaccuracies.  On the other side of this
digital divide are many practitioners and professionals from a wide
variety of fields including many who work in computer and internet related
fields who use this tool constantly.  I have used this tool extensively in
posts that I have sent on a variety of topics and I have used it for facts
and information to support the content of the posts in question.  As with
any source of information, one must check information carefully if the
document or content to be shared is important.  Notwithstanding, incorrect
information is not found only in popular and internet resources, academic
journals have had a major share of hoaxes and falsifications not to
mention common ordinary garden variety mistakes or errors.

REFERENCE: ENCYCLOPEDIAS:  [MEDIEV-L:41111] RE: Wikipedia : [ Should the
Consumer Product Safety Commision Put a Warning Label on the Wikipedia? ]
<http://snipurl.com/c7uu>

Tis a real pleasure to read the words Wikipedia and good in the same
sentence and a big thanks to Andy Carvin for putting them there.
I wonder how much use of the Wikipedia has been made by those who are
vocal in criticizing the tool, and how much of the criticism is based on
assumption or second hand information.


Sincerely, David Dillard Temple University (215) 204 - 4584

----------------------------------- Andy Carvin Program Director EDC Center for Media & Community acarvin @ edc . org http://www.digitaldivide.net http://www.tsunami-info.org Blog: http://www.andycarvin.com ----------------------------------- _______________________________________________ DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of the message.

Reply via email to