On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:42:12 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > Well, I think I'd call that aggravation.
Ok, if we do not have to bend to the C winds, then the default would be to have switch NOT fall through. That way we do not have to code "break;" at all. Is that aggravation? And then for those rare times when a falling through is required, recycle the "goto" or any other existing key word - (I hear that "static" is always available) - to affect a fall through behaviour. Anyhow, sorry to have been a nuisance again. -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia skype: derek.j.parnell