On 30.04.2010 16:27, Daniel Keep wrote:
>
>
> lurker wrote:
>> FeepingCreature Wrote:
>>
>>> Phobos1 is shit. The Tango devs know this, the Phobos devs know it. Anyone
>>> who denies it has never compared the Phobos and Tango sourcecode.
>>
>> It's impossible to verify those claims because reading the Tango source
>> might taint one's mind and after that one wouldn't be allowed to contribute
>> any code to Phobos anymore.
>
> Well, there are other objective means.
>
> This is a subjective statement: but as someone who has used D
> extensively over the past several years, including both Phobos and
> Tango, I honestly believe that Tango is generally of a higher quality.
>
> Except for Tango's Zip code which is an abomination and should be killed
> with fire--the original author is clearly a talentless hack.
>
I don't know the Tango zip code, but -- the Phobos zip code has/had a very
common bug where it causes/caused silent data loss. Beat that.
