On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 23:43 +0800, Lionello Lunesu wrote: > On 22-11-2010 19:10, Russel Winder wrote: [ . . . ] > > GIven that your system is a Makefile manager, you problably need to > > argue why a new system and not add-ins to CMake -- which is now the > > default makefile manager system. > > Did I miss a memo? I never heard of CMake, and suddenly it's the default?
There are defaults and defaults. Perhaps what I should have said was: for those people who wish to continue to use Make as the build tool underneath a modern framework then CMake is the de facto standard tool for managing Make files. Personally I do not like the CMake language, I much prefer Python, Lisp, etc. hence I prefer Waf and SCons. There is no doubt though that many people prefer CMake over SCons, Waf, Autotools , and Make. If anyone involved in any aspect of build has not heard of all of these tools then it is almost certainly in that person's best interest to do a little bit of investigation and learning. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@russel.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
