Nick Sabalausky wrote: > "Bill Baxter" <wbax...@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:mailman.977.1296083661.4748.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com... >> Mercurial gives every revision two numbers: >> >> Is that the kind of thing you're wanting? >> > > Yea, and that's pretty much the original thing I was saying: It's nice that > Hg seems to have it, but Git doesn't appear to be particularly interested in > it. > Of course, Git does not have it! Svn has it so it *must* be a bad idea ;)
Jerome
PS: FWIW, I agree with you. Plus, there is another use case where
sequential number are very useful: each time you want to operate on
a past revision in your own repository (e.g "hg up n" or "hg diff -r
n"), it is much easier to designate that revision with a sequential
number than with the hash.
--
mailto:jeber...@free.fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeber...@jabber.fr
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
