On 4/14/12, Robert Clipsham <rob...@octarineparrot.com> wrote:
> On 13/04/2012 22:10, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> !nothrow
>
> nonothrow. May as well drop nothrow and use !throw if we're doing that!

Might as well rename it to something else. It's called "nothrow", but
it can actually throw a Throwable, but not an Exception. Quite an odd
naming if you ask me.

Reply via email to