On Wednesday, 18 April 2012 at 17:05:08 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/17/2012 9:00 PM, bearophile wrote:
> I think the problem of ~100 open pull requests needs to be
faced better. People
> that see their patches rot in that list probably don't feel
rewarded enough to
> submit more patches.
Consider that 8 out of 9 submitted pull requests for dmd have
been pulled, and the current unpulled list does not include
solutions for issues people are regarding as critical blockers.
It might be a good policy to have the submitter (or even
yourself) close pull requests that aren't ready for merging and
reopen them once they are ready to be reviewed. This would help
make the queue more manageable and easier to see what's ready to
consider and what is not (it's a shame pull requests don't have
simple tagging/labeling like GitHub's issues).
Regards,
Brad Anderson
