On Saturday, 18 August 2012 at 01:07:43 UTC, F i L wrote:
Your example:float f; if (condition1) f = 7; ... code ... if (condition2) ++f;is flawed in that condition1 is _required_ to pass in sync with condition2, or you'll get a NaN in the result.
It is not flawed as that is exactly what he said condition1 did until the maintenance programmer made a change which caused this to no longer be in sync with condition2 (most likely fixing a bug as condition1 really should have been false).
