On Thursday, 27 September 2012 at 15:00:23 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2012-09-27 15:42, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 9/27/12, Walter Bright <newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote:
D will probably not bother with the 64 bit SEH.
How come, and what will be the consequences of this?
Anyway great work so far!
What he said. What about this:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/1eyas8tf.aspx
Not SEH?
This _is_ the 64 bit SEH implementation (although it is
table-based instead of relying on setup in the function
prologues, like on 32 bit Windows).
Walter seems to imply that he will roll/port his own EH mechanism?
David