On Thursday, 27 September 2012 at 15:00:23 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-09-27 15:42, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 9/27/12, Walter Bright <newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote:
D will probably not bother with the 64 bit SEH.

How come, and what will be the consequences of this?

Anyway great work so far!

What he said. What about this:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/1eyas8tf.aspx

Not SEH?

This _is_ the 64 bit SEH implementation (although it is table-based instead of relying on setup in the function prologues, like on 32 bit Windows).

Walter seems to imply that he will roll/port his own EH mechanism?

David

Reply via email to