On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 08:40:40 +0100, Don <turnyourkidsintoc...@nospam.com>
wrote:
On Friday, 14 June 2013 at 06:49:08 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-06-13 16:44, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I've always use VIM without any problems. Is not what you typically
call
an IDE though. I think now some of "our guys" are using Geany
moderately
successfully, for sure much better than Ecplise and Mono plugins. IIRC,
the main problem with those huge IDEs were memory usage and death-files
(files that made the IDE crash consistently).
I think there a lot of working advanced editors for D, but IDEs are
quite behind (at least in Linux).
I agree. But he said at the end of the talk that he didn't want
codecompletion refactoring or anything like that. Now he said he just
wants something better than Notepad that is stable.
I don't know what's going on here, somehow people are consistently
misunderstanding me.
The question in the talk was along the lines of "what's wrong with D's
IDEs". And people expected the problem was that they don't have good
refactoring support or something. But the problem is much more severe:
Mono-D is not as good as Notepad.
EclipseD is not as good as Notepad.
Because they are unstable.
Notepad++ is better than notepad:
http://notepad-plus-plus.org/download/v6.3.3.html
Windows only tho I'm afraid.
R
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
