On Thursday, 17 October 2013 at 13:31:06 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2013-10-17 11:33, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
There has been another important change that requires existing
packages
to be updated: All packages must now have the fields
"description" and
"license" present to be published. The license field has to be
set
according to the specification [1]. All existing branches and
version
tags stay unaffected by this requirement and are still
available.
Perhaps add the license: Apple Public Source License. This can
be useful for creating bindings to Apple specific libraries. Is
there a corresponding license for Microsoft?
Yes:
Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL)
Microsoft Reciprocal License (Ms-RL)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_source
