On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 06:35:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/25/2014 11:12 PM, Mike wrote:
The C standard library and C++ standard library are not part
of D-the-language.
D would even be better served by putting these features in
phobos as std.stdc
and std.stdcpp. This would make them just as conveniently
available to users,
and reduce the coupling between the language and the platform.
It's beginning to look more and more like an stdcpp is
achievable.
The implementation of it, however, is going to be ugly and very
specific to each C++ compiler. The user shouldn't need to have
to see that ugliness, though.
It also means that implementing stdcpp is going to require
someone who is very willing to go spelunking around the
underbelly of C++ ::std:: and understand it, which is a tall
order.
You must have stopped reading after my first paragraph :)
I seem to have that effect :(