On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 19:03:11 UTC, Andy Smith wrote:
I don't want to sound negative but the editing of Chuck's talk
could be a lot better IMHO. Round about 30:00 he describes a
code example which isn't shown in the video!. He's making
multiple references to lines/code etc. that were visible to the
attendees at the conference but aren't visible on the video.
Having seen it in person, Chuck's talk was a *great* advocacy
of D. But seeing it second time round on youtube I'm not
feeling it the same way :-(
I appreciate the work that UVU have put in to making the talks
available so I *really* don't mean to sound unappreciative or
disrespectful, but I think in this case it might make sense to
go back and revisit this particular talk. Specifically when
Chuck is talking about a specific code sample / line of code,
it needs to be put into the video. Otherwise context is
completely lost and viewers will be left confused + bewildered.
Regards,
Andy.
Yes. I enjoyed the talk until he got to the code examples. I got
lost and shut it off.
