1. You said CTFE engine can be ctfeable itself? But it uses
unions in BCValue - it's not going to work in CTFE, is it? Just
wondering myself what's the way to have polymorphism at compile
time.
2. The byte code generator interface has no mean to declare
functions? In case of LLVM jit one would want to declare
functions so that jit can use registers to pass parameters for a
bit more extra speed, though it's probably not worth it.
- Re: Battle-plan for CT... Robert burner Schadek via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Battle-plan for CT... Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Battle-plan for CT... Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Battle-plan for CT... Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Battle-plan for CT... Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Battle-plan for CT... Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Battle-plan for CT... Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Battle-plan for CT... Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Battle-plan for CT... Johan Engelen via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Battle-plan for CT... Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Battle-plan for CT... Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Battle-plan for CT... Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Battle-plan for CT... Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Battle-plan for CT... Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Battle-plan for CT... Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Battle-plan for CT... Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Battle-plan for CT... Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Battle-plan for CT... Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Battle-plan for CT... Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Battle-plan for CT... Dominikus Dittes Scherkl via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Battle-plan for CT... Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce