On 04/07/2017 05:44 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
2. It's on all of the "Accepted OSS Licenses" lists that major corps have
because of Boost itself being used in those companies. If your license
isn't on
the list, your project isn't being used.
Yup. We figured every corporation that uses C++ has accepted Boost, so
this would be a no-brainer for them to accept D's license.
Anyone "in the know" have a any "inside scoop" regarding the such
organization's perspective on the "zlib/libpng" license? I tend to favor
it for my own OSS projects, since it's (in my perspective) at least as
liberal as Boost, but very, very, ultra-easy to read/understand even for
an everyday layman. But I would love to hear from anyone with more
in-the-trenches experience how realistic that really plays out in the
"real world".
I wonder if maybe it would be worth my while to dual-license my OSS
dlang projects under both Boost and zlib/libpng. Anyone with real-world
expertise in the area have any ("number five alive!") eeeenput?
