On 2/25/2019 7:17 PM, Manu wrote:
I'm literally astonished that it's been agreed it's fine that
a copy constructor can mutate the source... and I can't help but draw
contrast to the exact same sorts of arguments that people were using
to break my DIP,
Mutating the lvalue ref was not the issue, as I recall. It was conversion of the
value to a temporary of a different type, then modifying the temporary, not the
original.
https://digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/announce/DIP_1016--ref_T_accepts_r-values--Formal_Assessment_54145.html#N54345
It is not analogous to the mutable cpctor argument case, because there is no
hidden conversion to a temporary.
