On Friday, 22 May 2020 at 14:37:04 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
I think the source of the problem is that Walter's DIPs require the community to prove that Walter's proposal is so bad that he needs to reject it. Anyone else's proposal has to prove that it's worthy of being added to the language. There's a big perceived gap between those two. As I've said many times, it's odd for someone to judge his own DIPs, ...
When either Walter or Atila author a DIP, their spot in the "convince both or face rejection" duopoly could be taken by another person.
