On Wednesday, 26 April 2023 at 15:07:36 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
Again, all of this was covered and argumented during the DIP discussionThe goal is to improve the language, not find excuses or workarounds, don't defend obfuscation, move forward
Your proposals were built on unrealistic examples and false dichotomies. If the only choice is 48-character informative names or two-character uninformative names, the problem is not the language.
