On Friday, 7 July 2023 at 03:06:28 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
As time moves on, the D language has to evolve as well. What do we do with obsolete and/or problem-causing, legacy features?

[...]

I respectfully disagree, and prefer to keep going on with the current deprecation and cleanup policy: Scott Meyers' DConf 2014 keynote all the way down.

On the other side, there's no problem at all in resurrect dead features, when living without them proved to be a pain (I agree with Rikki, hex strings).

/Paolo
  • Evolving the ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
    • Re: Evol... Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole via Digitalmars-d-announce
      • Re: ... Hipreme via Digitalmars-d-announce
        • ... Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole via Digitalmars-d-announce
      • Re: ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
    • Re: Evol... zjh via Digitalmars-d-announce
      • Re: ... zjh via Digitalmars-d-announce
        • ... zjh via Digitalmars-d-announce
          • ... zjh via Digitalmars-d-announce
    • Re: Evol... Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d-announce
      • Re: ... Guillaume Piolat via Digitalmars-d-announce
        • ... Nick Treleaven via Digitalmars-d-announce
          • ... Guillaume Piolat via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Jesse Phillips via Digitalmars-d-announce
        • ... jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce
        • ... Olivier Pisano via Digitalmars-d-announce
        • ... Max Samukha via Digitalmars-d-announce
    • Re: Evol... IchorDev via Digitalmars-d-announce
      • Re: ... Nick Treleaven via Digitalmars-d-announce

Reply via email to