On Friday, 7 July 2023 at 13:01:53 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:

Possibly obsolete features could become deprecations before they are actually removed.

It just seems to me, instead of complaining when features become deprecated, people will complain when obsolete feature becomes deprecated and they see the message. The proposal here is that they see the message later. In the meantime, nothing will prevent people from using the obsolete feature all over.

      • Re: ... Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole via Digitalmars-d-announce
      • Re: ... harakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
    • Re: Evol... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
  • Re: Evolving ... zjh via Digitalmars-d-announce
    • Re: Evol... zjh via Digitalmars-d-announce
      • Re: ... zjh via Digitalmars-d-announce
        • ... zjh via Digitalmars-d-announce
  • Re: Evolving ... Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d-announce
    • Re: Evol... Guillaume Piolat via Digitalmars-d-announce
      • Re: ... Nick Treleaven via Digitalmars-d-announce
        • ... Guillaume Piolat via Digitalmars-d-announce
          • ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • ... Jesse Phillips via Digitalmars-d-announce
      • Re: ... jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce
      • Re: ... Olivier Pisano via Digitalmars-d-announce
      • Re: ... Max Samukha via Digitalmars-d-announce
  • Re: Evolving ... IchorDev via Digitalmars-d-announce
    • Re: Evol... Nick Treleaven via Digitalmars-d-announce
      • Re: ... IchorDev via Digitalmars-d-announce
        • ... IchorDev via Digitalmars-d-announce
        • ... Nick Treleaven via Digitalmars-d-announce

Reply via email to