http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463
--- Comment #25 from Leandro Lucarella <llu...@gmail.com> 2010-07-04 08:05:15 PDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > I just voted for it. It would be great if you could define some benchmarks by > which you assess the improvements your approach is bringing. I will try to do a couple of benchmarks when I have the time, but I think the DMD-part of the patch should be merged, even if the current GC is slower with the precise scanning, because having info on the pointers locations open a lot of new possibilities GC-wise, like moving collectors. This can be explored in the feature, once the compiler provide the necessary information about types to the GC. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------