http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463
--- Comment #78 from Leandro Lucarella <llu...@gmail.com> 2010-09-15 05:51:08 PDT --- (In reply to comment #77) > There's a small bug in the memory clearing in mallocNoSync(), that could cause > memory leaks. Will post patch on request (nobody is using this anyway, > right?). I ported it to my GC, so I'm interested in knowing what the bug is about to check if I have it too. > Also, I found out that that SENTINEL is dead code. Uncommenting the "debug = > SENTINEL;" line on start of gcx.d will not include the code in > "version(SENTINEL)" blocks, because "debug" identifiers and "version" > identifiers live in different namespaces. Makes me wonder, does anyone ever > use > the SENTINEL stuff for testing? Or just thought he'd be using it? Btw. someone > said 16 bytes is the minimum alignment on OSX, so SENTINEL is broken there > anyway. Yeah, I think most of the versioned code is dead or close to it, because I doubt anybody test it. In my GC, which makes SENTINEL and MEMSTOMP run-time configurations, SENTINEL is broken and I didn't had the time to fix it yet. MEMSTOMP seems to work though. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------