http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463
--- Comment #119 from David Simcha <dsim...@yahoo.com> 2011-04-14 19:47:44 PDT --- (In reply to comment #118) > Also, even if the compiler emits the tables necessary for more precise gc, the > gc implementation can ignore them and do it the old way. Emitting the tables > makes it possible for people to experiment with various kinds of gc > strategies. I still think that, instead of hard coding this logic into the compiler, we should make TypeInfo templated. (See DIP 8 from ages ago, http://www.wikiservice.at/d/wiki.cgi?LanguageDevel/DIPs/DIP8). This would allow different runtime implementations to customize how the pointer offset info works without modifying the compiler. It would also make typeinfo extensible, which is generally a good thing. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
