On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:27 PM, grauzone <n...@example.net> wrote: > Why not use scope to allocate the class on the stack? > For everything else, I agree with Donald Knuth (if he really said that...)
That's fine too, and would fit in with his needs to implement interfaces. But again, if he's worried about caching some parameters but not worried about the overhead of virtual calls.. something's off.
