Hello Joel

Maybe, you should look on the Helix Library.
www.dsource.org/projects/helix
But in my opinion you should write down all classes which You want to implement 
in your library, and then all relations between these classes. This approach 
warrants you essentially correct structure. I don't know what do you mean when 
you write "test". If you want to test yours classes then the best method are 
the unittests. But if you only want to verify that library was correct 
installed then you just should use any component of the library. That as you do 
that in your example code. If you will write more about targets of your library 
then I could tell you more.
I really apologizefor my horrible English, but I hope you understood.

------------------------------------

Joel C. Salomon Wrote:

> I’m starting work on my Geometric Algebra library
> <http://www.dsource.org/projects/gald>, and I’d like some tips on
> structuring the source tree. Is there a “standard” place to put the
> library test/demonstration?
> 
> Right now I’m starting with:
> 
> trunk/
>       gald/
>            e2.d
>       test.d
>       dsss.conf
> 
> with the files as follows:
> 
> e2.d:
>       module gald.e2;
> 
>       struct vector2 {
>               real x;
>               real y;
>       }
> 
> test.d:
>       module test;
> 
>       import gald.e2;
> 
>       int main(char[][] args) {
>               vector2 v;
>               return 0;
>       }
> 
> dsss.conf:
>       name=gald
>       [gald]
>       [test.d]
>       target=test_gald
> 
> Is this a reasonable start, or am I buying trouble for myself with the
> layout and module declarations? What are the “best practices” for such a
> project?
> 
> —Joel Salomon

Reply via email to