Robert Clipsham wrote: > This should do what you want: Thanks! :-)
Is it possible to do this with an interface instead of a base class?
I'm not familiar with how the former work ...
Best wishes,
-- Joe
Robert Clipsham wrote: > This should do what you want: Thanks! :-)
Is it possible to do this with an interface instead of a base class?
I'm not familiar with how the former work ...
Best wishes,
-- Joe