Robert Clipsham wrote: > This should do what you want: Thanks! :-)
Is it possible to do this with an interface instead of a base class? I'm not familiar with how the former work ... Best wishes, -- Joe
Robert Clipsham wrote: > This should do what you want: Thanks! :-)
Is it possible to do this with an interface instead of a base class? I'm not familiar with how the former work ... Best wishes, -- Joe