So what's the word on this? Will we have simple indexing of tuples via T[] or do we still need T.field[] and T._1 ? The situations is the same in 2.048 as it was in 2.047.
There are more examples of tuples being used via T[] in some Phobos code examples (which don't compile and I've reported that). Otherwise if it stays the way it is I'll send Andrei a message to add the corrections to the errata. Philippe Sigaud Wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 19:03, Sean Kelly <s...@invisibleduck.org> wrote: > > > The next release, 2.048, should bring things in line with TDPL. I had > > meant to do this for 2.047, but was too busy with other work to finish in > > time. > > > > Do you mean, indexing tuples directly by a CT value as in msg[1]? Because > that was the only error here, I think. > > <div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 19:03, Sean Kelly <span > dir="ltr"><<a > href="mailto:s...@invisibleduck.org">s...@invisibleduck.org</a>></span> > wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 > .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"> > The next release, 2.048, should bring things in line with TDPL. I had meant > to do this for 2.047, but was too busy with other work to finish in time.<br> > </blockquote></div><br><div>Do you mean, indexing tuples directly by a CT > value as in msg[1]? Because that was the only error here, I > think.</div><div><br></div> >