On Sunday 12 September 2010 19:31:23 Andrej Mitrovic wrote: > I was refering to the open method, or when calling the constructor of > Text. But it doesn't actually *read* the contents until I ask it to > (which is a good thing). In other news it's late and I'm talking crazy > tonight, sorry. :)
Well, you do appear to be 9 hours ahead of me, time zone-wise, and you do appear to be up rather late. Entertainingly, the time difference makes for interesting timestamps in the messages as our respective clients put in the local time that a message is sent: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sunday 12 September 2010 18:04:14 Andrej Mitrovic wrote: Mine also appears to be in 24 time, while yours is in 12 hour time, and mine seems to want to put second-precision, while yours only cares about minute- precision. The Date format is a fair bit different as well. Not that it really matters, but it's interesting nonetheless. - Jonathan M Davis
