On 10/11/2010 20:15, Jesse Phillips wrote:
div0 Wrote:
Well done, glad you proved me wrong.
It does seem unlikely that size_t is wrong,
though you can test it easily enough:
compile a test C program to see what size it is and compare it to the D
version:
void main() {
printf("sizeof: %d", sizeof(size_t));
}
It should be 4 on a 32 bit system& 8 for 64 bit.
Hope I didn't say size_t. stat_t, a very complicated struct known as struct
stat in C. I don't know for sure that it is wrong, but at this point it is the
most likely candidate.
Also none of the changes I made related to the question affected the ability of
the program to work (maybe a more complicated one). Just glad I wasn't to far
off in my translation.
Sorry, me misreading.
You can still do the size check for the stat_t struct as well,
I always double check the size of structs when doing those conversions
as it's very easy to get it wrong.
--
My enormous talent is exceeded only by my outrageous laziness.
http://www.ssTk.co.uk
