For function parameters where the "scope" keyword doesn't matter (e.g. intrinsic types, many classes, structs, etc.), does "in" produce different code from "const"?
- "in" vs "const" Sean Eskapp
- Re: "in" vs "const" Steven Schveighoffer
For function parameters where the "scope" keyword doesn't matter (e.g. intrinsic types, many classes, structs, etc.), does "in" produce different code from "const"?