Re: "in" vs "const"

[Steven Schveighoffer]

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:25:38 -0500, Sean Eskapp <eatingstap...@gmail.com>  
wrote:

For function parameters where the "scope" keyword doesn't matter (e.g.
intrinsic types, many classes, structs, etc.), does "in" produce  
different
code from "const"?

No.

-Steve