On Thursday, 31 December 2020 at 14:56:37 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
On Thursday, 31 December 2020 at 09:57:01 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
On Thursday, 31 December 2020 at 07:32:31 UTC, RSY wrote:
[...]

But they should be aware that C++ *as a language* has a long way to go before it gets all the features etc that D has. Maybe 2023, maybe 2027, who knows. Maybe that's fine for them, but not for me.

Au contraire; I find that C++ has modernised relatively successful and has a lot of great proposals in the pipeline. Of course they may all get rejected, but even if only some of them get accepted, C++ starts to have a leg up on D in my opinion.

It could take a few years indeed, but what will D do in that same time window?

That's true, but until that happens D is superior. Time will tell 😊
              • Re:... Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... RSY via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... SealabJaster via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... SealabJaster via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... Imperatorn via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... Ola Fosheim Grostad via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d-learn
  • Re: C++ or D? Imperatorn via Digitalmars-d-learn

Reply via email to