I find myself writing foreach (_; 0 .. n) doSomething(); // no using the variable `_`
. What about relaxing the syntax to allow foreach (; 0 .. n) and/or foreach (0 .. n) ?Thereby making the `ForeachTypeList` of `AggregateForeach` in the grammar rule [1] optional.
[1] https://dlang.org/spec/statement.html#foreach-statement