On Friday, 4 November 2022 at 10:57:12 UTC, Hipreme wrote:
...
What do we use instead?
I won't lie about the fact package.d forced me to workaround
elusive "bugs" in my usage(1) but what is the alternative if we
don't want to work around it?
(1)(ime : had cases of package.d requiring compiler specific
pragmas for LDC, and dub can't find the package's `source` files
at all if it's a multi file subpackage intended to be imported
only, i never got it working with `package.d`, only a single
source file setup `*packagename*.d` would work...)
