On Saturday, 4 February 2023 at 19:49:41 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
I'm not sure what Adam's getting at when he says "hopelessly broken" but it's basically a subset of D.

You're almost guaranteed to hit some wall with it and have no solution. Some of these are bugs but some of them are by design; betterC is a set of arbitrary restrictions without much consistent reasoning behind them.

For example, with dlls, you still have to deal with all the potential problems of C library version mismatches, but if you use any module that touches a D feature it is likely to compile but then fail to link when someone uses it! All pain, no gain.
  • Re: betterC DLL ... Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole via Digitalmars-d-learn
  • Re: betterC DLL ... Adam D Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
    • Re: betterC... Tamas via Digitalmars-d-learn
      • Re: bet... Adam D Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
        • Re:... Tamas via Digitalmars-d-learn
          • ... bachmeier via Digitalmars-d-learn
            • ... Adam D Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
          • ... Adam D Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
            • ... Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • ... Tamas via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • ... Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • ... Tamas via Digitalmars-d-learn
            • ... Tamas via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • ... bachmeier via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • ... H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • ... Tamas via Digitalmars-d-learn
  • Re: betterC DLL ... ryuukk_ via Digitalmars-d-learn

Reply via email to