2011/8/30 Johannes Pfau <s...@example.com> > You could use the same hacks as in C: > Declare another function, make sure their located sequentially in > memory and compare their function addresses to get the size of the first > function (+ potential padding for alignment, but that shouldn't matter). > I think thats the way to go, a sequential function's adress minus the functions address. how can I make sure they're sequentially alligned?
> I do not recommend to do this though, it's a baaaad hack, and I don't > even remember how exactly it worked. > But better a (dirty) way then no way at all. I've also been playing with the idea of writing the function, and trying to compile that one function in a text file and importing at compile time in my main program. Then I can also count the bytes in the file. sounds an awfull lot of work :p
