Am 31.08.2011, 12:05 Uhr, schrieb maarten van damme
<maartenvd1...@gmail.com>:
Am I sure those functions aren't shift around during optimization?
No. It's just an ugly hack and likely to go up in flames.
Also what you try could only work with PIC but even then...
for now the function is working like a charm. int memory I can see that d
makes function size's multiples of four and fills the remaining bytes
with
cc's. is this coincidence and if not, why is this?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2863408/why-are-functions-loaded-at-aligned-addresses-in-x86-linux-for-elf-executables
