On Saturday, January 07, 2012 04:49:27 Timon Gehr wrote: > On 01/07/2012 12:37 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > > On Saturday, January 07, 2012 00:03:39 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote: > >> Most likely those functions are just implemented using inline > >> assembly, > >> therefore not usable in CTFE. > > > > Yeah, several functions in std.math use inline assembly. So, for them to > > be able to be used at compile time, either the compiler must be > > expanded to be able to run asm statements at compile time (which may or > > may not be planned and may or may not be reasonable), or those > > functions need another branch (using __cfte in an if condition) which > > doesn't use assembly. Or I suppose that if the extra check for __ctfe > > isn't considered particularly acceptable (after all, they're already > > using assembly) [snip.] > > If the if condition is a constant, there is no runtime overhead.
Ah, good point - though depending on what the compiler does, that may only be the case with -O. But anyone who really cares about that level of performance would be compiling with -O anyway. - Jonathan M Davis
