On 25.02.2012 8:05, bearophile wrote:
This program comes from a reduction of a bug I've found:


struct Foo {
     void init() {}
}
void main() {
     Foo*[] foos;
     //(*foos[0]).init(); // OK
     foos[0].init(); // Error: function expected before (), not null of type 
Foo*
}


What do you think about the idea of not allowing methods named init() in 
structs? (Especially if they are a @property). Or maybe there is a better 
solution, opinions welcome.

Bye,
bearophile

FWIW I've encountered this thingy while messing with phobos std.file around a year ago. Still allowed and mishandled it seems.

--
Dmitry Olshansky

Reply via email to