On 26-02-2012 02:54, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, February 25, 2012 17:54:44 H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 12:23:47AM +0100, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 26-02-2012 00:18, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, February 25, 2012 17:07:14 Timon Gehr wrote:
This is useful:
struct S{
@disable enum init = 0;
}
I thought that the way that you were supposed to do that was
@disable this();
- Jonathan M Davis
Yeah, I'm not sure what purpose the other example serves.
[...]
It serves to prove that we need to disallow 'init' as a member name. :-)
No. I think that he meant that he doesn't know what purpose
@disable enum init = 0;
serves given that
@disable this();
already disables the init property. The fact that you're able to override init
is a separate, albeit related issue. But yes, it should be disallowed to
declare any symbol as a member of a struct or class with the name init.
- Jonathan M Davis
Yep, exactly.
--
- Alex
