On Saturday, 14 April 2012 at 06:43:11 UTC, Manfred Nowak wrote:
F i L wrote:
It sounds like circular reasoning.
Several considerations pressed the design into the current form:
1) always changing output on unchanged input is hard to debug
2) GC needs to be saved from garbage, that looks like pointers
3) missed explicit initializations should not create syntax
errors
4) use hardware signalling to overcome some of the limitations
impressed by 3).
5) more???
For me the only questionable point is numer three.
-manfred
1) Good argument.
2) Don't know enough about the GC. Can't comment.
3) I agree. I just disagree with how they are expected to be used
without explicit definition.
4) I have no idea what you just said... :)
5) profit??
