On Tuesday, 24 April 2012 at 12:22:14 UTC, David Bryant wrote:
This bothers me for two reasons: firstly it's not a base class,
and secondly, it's a standard OO pattern of mine.
What's up with this?
Generally (and slightly inaccurately) speaking, D follows the
Java model for inheritance rather than the C++ one, where base
class protection attributes simply do not exist.
Besides that, I'm not quite sure what privately inheriting an
interface would buy you – there would be no implementation to
inherit anyway (except for final interface methods, but I doubt a
valid use case for this would be easy to find)?
David
