On Wednesday, 25 April 2012 at 17:06:00 UTC, SomeDude wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 April 2012 at 15:35:44 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:27:29 -0400, SomeDude
<lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 April 2012 at 08:34:40 UTC, SomeDude wrote:
Noone reproduces this ?
On my linux box, it runs in about 580ms, with or without the
writeln.
This is what I would expect.
But things can be strange when dealing with GC timings. Have
you tried profiling the code to see where the time is being
added?
-Steve
Did you compile with dmd -O -inline -release ?
I'll do some profiling later.
OK, I'm having a hard time producing data that support what I see
without profiling on, but it's still quite consistent accross
runs. I dunno what's wrong here.
