On 2012-04-25, SomeDude <lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 25 April 2012 at 15:35:44 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer > wrote: >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:27:29 -0400, SomeDude >> <lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wednesday, 25 April 2012 at 08:34:40 UTC, SomeDude wrote: >>> >>> Noone reproduces this ? >> >> On my linux box, it runs in about 580ms, with or without the >> writeln. >> >> This is what I would expect. >> >> But things can be strange when dealing with GC timings. Have >> you tried profiling the code to see where the time is being >> added? >> >> -Steve > > Did you compile with dmd -O -inline -release ?
I get fairly consistent result on Linux with dmd, but one oddity with gdc. With the first writeln in and the second commented out: gdmd -O slow.d time ./slow ... 0.342 total gdmd -O -release slow.d time ./slow ... 2.866 total If I put both writelns in, I don't see the fast version. % gdc --version gdc (Debian 4.6.2-4) 4.6.2 David
