On 2012-05-23 13:31, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 02:21:14 -0400, Jacob Carlborg <d...@me.com> wrote:

On 2012-05-22 23:01, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:

It looks like code that is not called on Windows. Which doesn't make
sense. It would seem that you must initialize a critical section in
order to use it.

I can't find any reference to STI_monitor in dmd, dmc, or druntime
source code, except those calls that are done for Posix only. This isn't
some closed-source mystery, I think it is just unused code.

Sean, does this make sense? Are we using uninitialized critical
sections?

-Steve

I found a call now, it's in "_d_criticalenter", both in critical.c and
critical_.d.


OK, so does this mean monitor is only used on Posix, and critical is
used only on windows? This seems a little weird. Especially since we are
still compiling monitor.c.

-Steve

No, there's a "_d_criticalenter" for Posix in critical(_).d/c which calls "_STI_critical_init". It seems there's a duplicate call for "_STI_critical_init" on Posix, in dmain2.d and in critical(_).d/c.

Also this actually looks like a big mess:

* critical_.d and critical.c contains the same code. critical_.d is used in the posix makefile. critical.c _and_ critical_.d is used in the win32 makefile

* "_STI_critical_init" is implemented on both Posix and Windows, but it's only called on Posix

* "_STI_critical_init" is called on multiple places on Posix. In dmain2.d and in "_d_criticalenter".

--
/Jacob Carlborg

Reply via email to