On Monday, 25 June 2012 at 15:39:19 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 06/25/2012 02:18 PM, Namespace wrote:
Fine. But nothing of them explain the Stack overflow if i add an
additional method or disable/add an additional ctor.

It does not have to be explained: it is a compiler bug.

Then it will take months or years until it is fixed ... too bad.

And that Ref!(Foo) rf = new Foo(); ends even with "Stack overflow" and Ref!(Foo) rf2 = new Ref!(Foo)(new Foo()); not has the same explanation "Compiler Bug", hm?

Reply via email to