On 25-Jul-12 19:32, David wrote:
Am 25.07.2012 16:23, schrieb Dmitry Olshansky:
On 25-Jul-12 17:54, David wrote:
Ok here we go:
perf.data: http://dav1d.de/perf.data
and a fancy image (showing the results of perf):
http://dav1d.de/output.png
I hope anyone knows where the time is spent.
Most time spent:
+ 53,14% bralad [unknown] [k] 0xc01e5d2b
Would be cool to have before/after graph.
I don't know how to make comparisons with perf.data but here is the
captured data of the "working" version:
http://dav1d.de/output_before.png
perf.data: http://dav1d.de/perf_before.data
It looks like a syscall/opengl issue. You somehow managed to hit a dark
corner of GL driver. It's either a fallback to software (partial) or
some extra translation layer.
I once had a cool table that showed which GL calls are direct to
hardware and which are not for various nvidia cards.
Now the trick is to get an idea why. The best idea to debug driver
related stuff is to test on some other computer (like different version
of OS, video card etc.).
Can't quite decipher output but I find it strange that it mentions
_d_invariant. You'd better compiler with -release if you care for speed.
--
Dmitry Olshansky
