On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:44:35 +0200, bearophile <bearophileh...@lycos.com>
wrote:
Namespace:
Then: What is the problem to introduce such shorthand?
I don't know.
I have a partial enhancement on the topic:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4571
Bye,
bearophile
I believe at least part of the explanation is that Walter wants NotNull to
implemented in a library. That's part of the reason for introducing
@disable this().
Now, one could certainly argue that int? be translated by the compiler into
NotNull!int, and the implementation lie in druntime.
--
Simen
