On 07/27/2012 04:35 PM, bearophile wrote:

But implementing good non-null types in library code is hard

It is closer to impossible than to hard.

(rather harder than implementing vector ops in library code on library defined
vectors). I think @disable isn't enough to cover what Spec# shows good
non-null types are meant to be.


Non-null types in Spec# are unsound.

Reply via email to